MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL,PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
RAJYA SABHA
QUESTION NO 542
ANSWERED ON 08.08.2013
SHRI Y.S. CHOWDARY Will the Minister of PERSONNEL,PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS be pleased to satate :- (a) the details of anti-corruption bills introduced during the last three years, the status thereof; and
(b) the steps taken/being taken by Government to pass anti-corruption bills at the earliest?
ANSWER
Minister of State in the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions and Minister of State in the Prime Minister’s Office. (SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY) (a): During the past three years, the Government has introduced the following anti-corruption Bills in the Parliament for effectively tackling corruption:- Year Name of the Bill Present Status 2010 The Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bill, 2010 (The Whistle Blowers Protection Bill, 2011). The Bill was passed by the Lok Sabha on 27.12.2011 and presently is pending in the Rajya Sabha 2011 The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Bill, 2011 The Bill was passed by the Lok Sabha on 27.12.2011 and presently is pending in the Rajya Sabha The Prevention of Bribery of Foreign Public Officials and Officials of Public International Organizations Bill, 2011 The Bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on 25.3.2011 and yet to be passed by the Lok Sabha 2012 ------
(b): These Bills are under consideration of the Parliament. Government is keen on early passage of these Bills.
The Appropriation (No. 3) Bill, 2012 And The Finance Bill, 2012
Thank you very much, Sir, for having given me this opportunity. To begin with, I may be permitted to quote a few headlines -- from one of the financial newspapers which show our country's economic situation today. These headlines are, and I quote, 'Gloom to Deepen: India Inc', 'Moody's Adds Insult to Injury, Scissors Rating of 3 Banks', and 'Rupee Stays in a Hole, Sinks to 53.97 vs Dollar'.
Sir, today, every sector in India, whether it is steel, cement, telecom, power or infrastructure, is facing huge financial imbalance, mainly due to indecisions at various levels of the Government. Unfortunately, for the past couple of years, the Government has been reeling under scam after scam like 2G scam, Commonwealth scam, iron ore scam and so on. Because of indecision at the highest levels
of the Government, the country has been losing its direction which is reflecting very clearly in every economic activity and which is also directly resulting in weakening of our rupee. Sir, corporates, because of this indecision, are forced to refer their cases to CDR for financial restructuring, which does not augur well for an economy that has seen an unprecedented growth in the last couple of decades. If this trend continues, I am afraid, ultimately, all our banks and financial institutions, which are the backbone not only of our industry but the whole of our economy, may land in big trouble losing their credibility in the international market. Ultimately, the country will lose its credit rating. Sir, as we are all aware, yesterday, LIC's rating was downgraded. A few months ago SBI's rating was also downgraded. These are great institutions of trust and faith. They are the leaders in their respective sectors. Downgrading of the leader in a sector is a clear reflection as to what is happening in that sector. Sir, post- Independence, all our Indian entrepreneurs have worked very hard and created industrial growth which has helped all the banks in developing their own networks.
Sir, today, our farmers want support for sustainable farming but not doles. But Government after Government has preferred to give doles, for obvious reasons! Subsidies on fertilizers, oil, power, etc. are nothing but doles. Instead of giving these doles, Government should formulate good and balanced policies, have a level-playing field in business, so that different sectors of our economy can improve their financial health and, indirectly, will help the country's economy. The Government has to come out with aggressive plans, particularly in reducing imports which can go a long way in helping the farming community in improving their technology, agricultural implements and in yield-improvement technologies. The Government has been continuously silent about any aggressive policy in regard to production of renewable energy which can produce a lot of power, whether hydel or solar.
Sir, today many banks and Government departments are not taking any decision due to the 'fear of the unknown' which is a well- known fact. Unfortunately, we all agree that there is a complete breakdown and a paralysis of our decision-making process. It looks as if the Government is surviving with the support of ventilator. The country have had many scams and many problems like various by-elections, demands for smaller States, etc. I strongly request that the Government should deal with all these scams, etc. by appointing a task force exclusively for this purpose, without affecting the growth of the country.
Sir, in every developing economy, some systemic failures are bound to happen. But, we have to deal with such kind of failures in a matured manner and not in haste.
Sir, in any case, the time has also come for all the political parties to work with cooperation and coordination rather than confrontation and competition in the interest of the country. In any case, this Bill is a fait accompli approval. Thank you.
Sir, the Indian Medical Council Act was originally brought in 1956. It has been working extremely well for almost 50 to 55 years. Subsequently, prior to 2010, for five to six years, the CBI has been overviewing it and a couple of times, the Medical Council of India has been raided. It is obvious that everything was hushed up and managed and it was allowed to do all kinds of malpractices and things like that. The Government and the Ministry have become mere spectators. Even in 2010, when the Bill was finally brought, action was taken by the CBI, based on which the then President was arrested. It is really surprising to note that the whole thing has not happened overnight,like a magic. Fine, it has happened. The Ministry brought it before the House for ratification and asked for one year's time to form a proper Council again in a democratic way, particularly representing the whole country. It is really unfortunate that the hon. Minister is bringing it again and again. Last year, he brought it for taking one more year's extension. I am really unable to understand it. Are our Ministry and the Government so weak? Are we not in a position to reestablish a democratic autonomous body? Is the Government doing it for backdoor control? In fact, it reminds me of a small joke. When I was studying in intermediate, for two years I could not see a movie other than 'Yadon Ki Barat'. There was only one movie for continuously two years. Like that, the Ministry is coming every year for seeking extension. Ad hocism, as it is, is very bad. Moreover, if we see all over the world, our Indian doctors have got special quality and capability. Their foundation was extremely good. Our education system, particularly health care, is very important from our country's point of view. So such things are definitely not acceptable. By any chance, if the Prime Minister decides to run the whole country single handedly, is it possible? Is it possible without delegating powers andwithout creating autonomous institutions? This is really unfortunate to come to such a stage. In fact, in the last two years, so many scams have unearthed. There was no mention of any of these scams. The same story, the same saga have been continuing. There is no reply from the Minister. What is the guarantee that it will be completed in the next year also? We are not able to understand it.
I strongly oppose this Bill. Getting more time again shows the inefficiency of the Government. Thank you.
Mr. Deputy Chairman, Sir, I am thankful to you for giving me this opportunity to speak on this Bill. Though we have definitely most experienced Finance Minister in the world, the present Government has presented three General Budgets but none of the Budgets has tried to give any direction to our economy, not to say about the supplementary
The Government is not able to tame the inflation and the common people of the country are/have been suffering from high inflation and skyrocketing prices.
Out of the additional expenditure proposed, 93 per cent is for non-Plan expenditure whereas a meagre four per cent is for creating durable capital assets; hence, 96 per cent is for revenue expenditure only.
Of the Supplementary Demands of Rs.63,180 crores, only ten per cent, i.e. Rs.6,330 crores, is proposed to be met through increased revenues while the rest 90 per cent will have to be necessarily borrowed. Thereby, it can have two undesirable consequences -- (i) increased in high interest rates, leading to higher inflation and (ii) sucking the liquidity from the market, thereby reducing the funds’ availability for investments. This eventually will lead the private sector to postpone the capital assets’ investments, which will automatically stagnate the Government revenues, and with continuous rise in non-Plan expenditure, the revenue and fiscal deficit will further rise and the country will be caught in the vicious circle of lower growth and rising fiscal deficits and Government debt.
We need to guard ourselves against such uncontrolled growth in public debt so that our country does not face the serious default situation as we have been seeing in the case of Greece, Italy and Spain. To guard against this, I have two suggestions. If theGovernment is seeking supplementary grants in December, it means that a twelve months’ budgeted expenditure has been spent within eight months. Why should only the expenditure increase at all times? If the revenue is not growing and growth in some categories of expenditure is inevitable, why shouldn’t the Government plan and reduce expenditure under other heads well in advance, instead of approaching the Parliament for Supplementary Grants at the last minute?
The budgeted expenditure, this year, was over Rs.12 lakh crores. In making budgets for all large projects, it is a general practice that five per cent we normally keep as contingencies. Why not we start following the practice of keeping five cent as contingency for each head? And, thereby, it can be monitored in a better manner for avoiding this kind of last minute approaches.
The other subject is, we all know that agriculture is the backbone of our economy and about 70 per cent of the people are engaged in agricultural activities. But this Government, for some or
other reason, has not been able to do anything for the agriculture sector substantially.
There is no sustainable credit policy for the farmers and the cases of farmers’ suicide are/have been continuing. The main reason for farmers’ suicide is lack of credit, high rate of interest, non- availability of credit in time, and lack of other infrastructural facilities, though the Government has done so many studies for the infrastructure. Of course, State Governments are not in a position to provide any required benefits, financially, to the farmers. Thereby, a national fund is required to be created to address the problems of farmers. ... (Time-bell) ...
Even after 64 years of Independence, it is visible that governments after governments have been taking all actions only keeping in view to attract the voters and we are not able to develop any sustainable, long-term solutions.
Sir, I feel, now the time has definitely come to work with cooperation and coordination, and particularly, we have got an opportunity to learn lessons from the various mistakes already committed by the so-called developed countries and we need notrepeat those things. Thank you, Sir.
Maiden Speech & The Energy Conservation (Amendment) Bill, 2010
Hon. Vice-Chairman and respected Members, I rise to speak on the Energy Conservation (Amendment) Bill, 2010. Since this is my maiden speech, I would request you to allow me a few minutes to introduce myself before speaking on the Bill.
Sir, I am humbled by the great privilege of being a Member of this august House, which has seen stalwarts among its Members like Prof. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, Prof. N.G. Ranga, Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar, hon. Shri Atal Behari Vajpayee, and our present Prime Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh. I pay tributes to Shri N.T. Rama Raogaru, founder of the Telugu Desam Party, for providing leadership and identity to the people of Andhra Pradesh. I fondly remember his encouragement to the young people from all sections of the society. I thank Shri Nara Chandrababu Naidu, our party President and the legislators of Andhra Pradesh who have elected me to this august House.
Sir, this august body, where Members are drawn from diverse fields of arts, politics, eminent professionals, academics and industry, makes it unique in our great democracy. I come from an industrial background, which I had started at an early age. After doing my Post Graduation in Engineering in 1986, I had started a small-scale industry. This grew into a group of industries which presently employs 6000 people, known as the Sujana Group of Companies. The name 'Sujana', I am proud to say, was coined out of the first few letters of the names of my beloved parents, Shrimati Susheela and Shri Janardhana Rao. My grandfather, an IPS officer, retired from the CBI and my father retired as Superintending Engineer in the Government of Andhra Pradesh. My great grandfathers were agriculturists. So, the evolution of my career is in rural areas and, therefore, I am blessed with exposure to all major spheres of the society.
Sir, the Preamble to our Constitution says, "We the people of India give this country to ourselves..". To me the word "We" means all the people of India. I stressed on the word "all" because in the nature, the jungle law that rules is the survival of the cleverest; in the organized and civilized society, the law has to protect the meek from the strong. This was stated, over and over again, by the framers of our Constitution. The Preamble and articles 38(1), 38(2), 39B, 39C and 46 talk about reduction of inequality in income and giving equal access to resources of the country. Just as a blind man cannot thank us for giving him a mirror, the poor man cannot thank us for not implementing the equality, the mandate of the Constitution. Thus, the essence of the Constitution is equality to be achieved through a conscious attempt to help those in society, who cannot help themselves. A fine example of this is the philanthropic efforts of successful business people like Warren Buffet and Bill Gates. I commend the cause of charity in its full sense espoused by them. Perhaps, they believe that what they give,they have, and what they keep, they lose. These kind-hearted men are practising what Gandhiji said that rich people are the custodians and trustees of their wealth for the benefit of the poor. Since such kind hearts are not many, I would vote for a very visible hand of the Legislature, Executive and Judiciary to make laws and policies of affirmative action and vigorously implement them.
Sir, there is a State sanction behind every citizen's security and legitimate earning.The State, in turn, gets its authority and legitimacy from the citizens through the social contract concept developed by political philosophers like Thomas Hobbes and Locke and Rousseau. In a democratic country like India, periodic elections to State and Centre constitute the social contract and needs to be continuously strengthened.
Sir, while appreciating the efforts that are being made for rationalization of direct and indirect taxes, a time has come to restore estate duty which would be a step towards reducing the gap between the rich and the poor. Sir, for quite some time, I thought, eliminating poverty and creating wealth are the same. But, on being more matured, I realised that the creation of wealth will necessarily not eliminate poverty or reduce the gap between the rich and the poor.
Sir, the Government works for making a difference in the living standard of the people. It means that ensuring roti, kapda and makaan alone is not sufficient. Ensuring only them implies that we are not elevating the general...
Sir, while ensuring the above, we should target good health, education and creation of individual opportunity as our objective and guiding principle for governance.
Sir, having dwelt upon my political philosophy, I now move forward to discuss about the Energy Conservation (Amendment) Bill, 2010. The energy conservation as we all know is a wide topic that most of our hon. Members spoke. It broadly encompasses efficient utilization of electricity and fossil fuels. The current Bill in discussion appears to only cover the energy efficiency measures with a view to conserve power. Although it is important to address this issue, it would be desirable to adopt a holistic approach to include conservation of fuels and ecosystems.
Sir, the current installed capacity of 1,31,000 MW is required to be increased to about 9,50,000 MW by 2030 as stated by the hon. Prime Minister recently. To create this gigantic future electricity generating capacity, it is estimated that a massive Rs.60,000 billion investment is required. However, as the ho. Members are aware, this expenditure can be far from reality considering several Budgetary constraints. Therefore, I am of the opinion that part of this problem can be addressed through strict adherence to the measures proposed to be implemented through this Bill.
Sir, having gone through the proposed amendments, I suggest the following changes. Section 14(C) of the Energy Conservation Act, 2001, after the proposed amendment prohibits issuance of notification within six months in normal cases and one year in special circumstances. Even after the proposed amendment, there is no obligation on the part of the Government to issue notification prohibiting the use of energy inefficient equipment after six months or one year, as the case may be. Once a product is notified under section 14 (A), any equipment not conforming to prescribed norms should be automatically prohibited from sale, import, etc., after six months or one year, as the case may be.
A new section 14(A) is proposed to be inserted. As per this proposed section, in case there is a saving of energy by the designated consumer, an energy saving certificate would be issued. This can be sold to a designated consumer who is not complying with the energy consumption norms. There may be a case that for reasons, a designated consumer may not be in a position to encash these certificates. Therefore, a clear mechanism may be put in place to enable immediate encashment of such certificates.
In addition to the above suggestions, I propose the consideration of the following steps to make the initiatives of the Government for energy conservation more effective and meaningful. (1) target the sector where there is a scope for energy savings (2) Accelerate and incentivize indigenous R&D for developing energy efficient appliances and systems and provide fiscal incentives to industries established to absorb such energy efficient technologies; (3) Conversion of inefficient AC agricultural water pumps to either more efficient AC pump sets or DC pumps using permanent magnets; (4) All street, municipal and Government installation to switch to LED lighting mandatorily, in a phased manner, like in the United States of America, which has been following it; (5) To meet rural lighting requirements with solar and LED light combination which is cheaper and more sustainable, and the technology is fully proven, compared to current solar/CFL combinations; (6) Include use of LED luminaries in Lamp Bachat Yojana Scheme; (7) Reroute the perennial kerosene, MNRE subsidies towards promotion of sustainable energy efficient systems; (8) Weak aluminium conductors to be recycled/re-conducted or replaced to reduce the transmission and distribution losses; (9) Strictly enforce energy efficient norms and prohibit sale/import of energy inefficient devices; and (10) As is the adage, ‘power saved is power generated’, there should be a provision to incentivize virtual energy generation system.
Sir, with the above suggestions, I conclude my maiden speech and am grateful to the Chair and the hon. Members of the House for providing me this opportunity. Thank you very much, Sir.
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL,PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
RAJYA SABHA
QUESTION NO 542
ANSWERED ON 08.08.2013
SHRI Y.S. CHOWDARY Will the Minister of PERSONNEL,PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS be pleased to satate :- (a) the details of anti-corruption bills introduced during the last three years, the status thereof; and
(b) the steps taken/being taken by Government to pass anti-corruption bills at the earliest?
ANSWER
Minister of State in the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions and Minister of State in the Prime Minister’s Office. (SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY) (a): During the past three years, the Government has introduced the following anti-corruption Bills in the Parliament for effectively tackling corruption:- Year Name of the Bill Present Status 2010 The Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bill, 2010 (The Whistle Blowers Protection Bill, 2011). The Bill was passed by the Lok Sabha on 27.12.2011 and presently is pending in the Rajya Sabha 2011 The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Bill, 2011 The Bill was passed by the Lok Sabha on 27.12.2011 and presently is pending in the Rajya Sabha The Prevention of Bribery of Foreign Public Officials and Officials of Public International Organizations Bill, 2011 The Bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on 25.3.2011 and yet to be passed by the Lok Sabha 2012 ------
(b): These Bills are under consideration of the Parliament. Government is keen on early passage of these Bills.
The Appropriation (No. 3) Bill, 2012 And The Finance Bill, 2012
Thank you very much, Sir, for having given me this opportunity. To begin with, I may be permitted to quote a few headlines -- from one of the financial newspapers which show our country's economic situation today. These headlines are, and I quote, 'Gloom to Deepen: India Inc', 'Moody's Adds Insult to Injury, Scissors Rating of 3 Banks', and 'Rupee Stays in a Hole, Sinks to 53.97 vs Dollar'.
Sir, today, every sector in India, whether it is steel, cement, telecom, power or infrastructure, is facing huge financial imbalance, mainly due to indecisions at various levels of the Government. Unfortunately, for the past couple of years, the Government has been reeling under scam after scam like 2G scam, Commonwealth scam, iron ore scam and so on. Because of indecision at the highest levels
of the Government, the country has been losing its direction which is reflecting very clearly in every economic activity and which is also directly resulting in weakening of our rupee. Sir, corporates, because of this indecision, are forced to refer their cases to CDR for financial restructuring, which does not augur well for an economy that has seen an unprecedented growth in the last couple of decades. If this trend continues, I am afraid, ultimately, all our banks and financial institutions, which are the backbone not only of our industry but the whole of our economy, may land in big trouble losing their credibility in the international market. Ultimately, the country will lose its credit rating. Sir, as we are all aware, yesterday, LIC's rating was downgraded. A few months ago SBI's rating was also downgraded. These are great institutions of trust and faith. They are the leaders in their respective sectors. Downgrading of the leader in a sector is a clear reflection as to what is happening in that sector. Sir, post- Independence, all our Indian entrepreneurs have worked very hard and created industrial growth which has helped all the banks in developing their own networks.
Sir, today, our farmers want support for sustainable farming but not doles. But Government after Government has preferred to give doles, for obvious reasons! Subsidies on fertilizers, oil, power, etc. are nothing but doles. Instead of giving these doles, Government should formulate good and balanced policies, have a level-playing field in business, so that different sectors of our economy can improve their financial health and, indirectly, will help the country's economy. The Government has to come out with aggressive plans, particularly in reducing imports which can go a long way in helping the farming community in improving their technology, agricultural implements and in yield-improvement technologies. The Government has been continuously silent about any aggressive policy in regard to production of renewable energy which can produce a lot of power, whether hydel or solar.
Sir, today many banks and Government departments are not taking any decision due to the 'fear of the unknown' which is a well- known fact. Unfortunately, we all agree that there is a complete breakdown and a paralysis of our decision-making process. It looks as if the Government is surviving with the support of ventilator. The country have had many scams and many problems like various by-elections, demands for smaller States, etc. I strongly request that the Government should deal with all these scams, etc. by appointing a task force exclusively for this purpose, without affecting the growth of the country.
Sir, in every developing economy, some systemic failures are bound to happen. But, we have to deal with such kind of failures in a matured manner and not in haste.
Sir, in any case, the time has also come for all the political parties to work with cooperation and coordination rather than confrontation and competition in the interest of the country. In any case, this Bill is a fait accompli approval. Thank you.
Sir, the Indian Medical Council Act was originally brought in 1956. It has been working extremely well for almost 50 to 55 years. Subsequently, prior to 2010, for five to six years, the CBI has been overviewing it and a couple of times, the Medical Council of India has been raided. It is obvious that everything was hushed up and managed and it was allowed to do all kinds of malpractices and things like that. The Government and the Ministry have become mere spectators. Even in 2010, when the Bill was finally brought, action was taken by the CBI, based on which the then President was arrested. It is really surprising to note that the whole thing has not happened overnight,like a magic. Fine, it has happened. The Ministry brought it before the House for ratification and asked for one year's time to form a proper Council again in a democratic way, particularly representing the whole country. It is really unfortunate that the hon. Minister is bringing it again and again. Last year, he brought it for taking one more year's extension. I am really unable to understand it. Are our Ministry and the Government so weak? Are we not in a position to reestablish a democratic autonomous body? Is the Government doing it for backdoor control? In fact, it reminds me of a small joke. When I was studying in intermediate, for two years I could not see a movie other than 'Yadon Ki Barat'. There was only one movie for continuously two years. Like that, the Ministry is coming every year for seeking extension. Ad hocism, as it is, is very bad. Moreover, if we see all over the world, our Indian doctors have got special quality and capability. Their foundation was extremely good. Our education system, particularly health care, is very important from our country's point of view. So such things are definitely not acceptable. By any chance, if the Prime Minister decides to run the whole country single handedly, is it possible? Is it possible without delegating powers andwithout creating autonomous institutions? This is really unfortunate to come to such a stage. In fact, in the last two years, so many scams have unearthed. There was no mention of any of these scams. The same story, the same saga have been continuing. There is no reply from the Minister. What is the guarantee that it will be completed in the next year also? We are not able to understand it.
I strongly oppose this Bill. Getting more time again shows the inefficiency of the Government. Thank you.
Mr. Deputy Chairman, Sir, I am thankful to you for giving me this opportunity to speak on this Bill. Though we have definitely most experienced Finance Minister in the world, the present Government has presented three General Budgets but none of the Budgets has tried to give any direction to our economy, not to say about the supplementary
The Government is not able to tame the inflation and the common people of the country are/have been suffering from high inflation and skyrocketing prices.
Out of the additional expenditure proposed, 93 per cent is for non-Plan expenditure whereas a meagre four per cent is for creating durable capital assets; hence, 96 per cent is for revenue expenditure only.
Of the Supplementary Demands of Rs.63,180 crores, only ten per cent, i.e. Rs.6,330 crores, is proposed to be met through increased revenues while the rest 90 per cent will have to be necessarily borrowed. Thereby, it can have two undesirable consequences -- (i) increased in high interest rates, leading to higher inflation and (ii) sucking the liquidity from the market, thereby reducing the funds’ availability for investments. This eventually will lead the private sector to postpone the capital assets’ investments, which will automatically stagnate the Government revenues, and with continuous rise in non-Plan expenditure, the revenue and fiscal deficit will further rise and the country will be caught in the vicious circle of lower growth and rising fiscal deficits and Government debt.
We need to guard ourselves against such uncontrolled growth in public debt so that our country does not face the serious default situation as we have been seeing in the case of Greece, Italy and Spain. To guard against this, I have two suggestions. If theGovernment is seeking supplementary grants in December, it means that a twelve months’ budgeted expenditure has been spent within eight months. Why should only the expenditure increase at all times? If the revenue is not growing and growth in some categories of expenditure is inevitable, why shouldn’t the Government plan and reduce expenditure under other heads well in advance, instead of approaching the Parliament for Supplementary Grants at the last minute?
The budgeted expenditure, this year, was over Rs.12 lakh crores. In making budgets for all large projects, it is a general practice that five per cent we normally keep as contingencies. Why not we start following the practice of keeping five cent as contingency for each head? And, thereby, it can be monitored in a better manner for avoiding this kind of last minute approaches.
The other subject is, we all know that agriculture is the backbone of our economy and about 70 per cent of the people are engaged in agricultural activities. But this Government, for some or
other reason, has not been able to do anything for the agriculture sector substantially.
There is no sustainable credit policy for the farmers and the cases of farmers’ suicide are/have been continuing. The main reason for farmers’ suicide is lack of credit, high rate of interest, non- availability of credit in time, and lack of other infrastructural facilities, though the Government has done so many studies for the infrastructure. Of course, State Governments are not in a position to provide any required benefits, financially, to the farmers. Thereby, a national fund is required to be created to address the problems of farmers. ... (Time-bell) ...
Even after 64 years of Independence, it is visible that governments after governments have been taking all actions only keeping in view to attract the voters and we are not able to develop any sustainable, long-term solutions.
Sir, I feel, now the time has definitely come to work with cooperation and coordination, and particularly, we have got an opportunity to learn lessons from the various mistakes already committed by the so-called developed countries and we need notrepeat those things. Thank you, Sir.
Maiden Speech & The Energy Conservation (Amendment) Bill, 2010
Hon. Vice-Chairman and respected Members, I rise to speak on the Energy Conservation (Amendment) Bill, 2010. Since this is my maiden speech, I would request you to allow me a few minutes to introduce myself before speaking on the Bill.
Sir, I am humbled by the great privilege of being a Member of this august House, which has seen stalwarts among its Members like Prof. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, Prof. N.G. Ranga, Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar, hon. Shri Atal Behari Vajpayee, and our present Prime Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh. I pay tributes to Shri N.T. Rama Raogaru, founder of the Telugu Desam Party, for providing leadership and identity to the people of Andhra Pradesh. I fondly remember his encouragement to the young people from all sections of the society. I thank Shri Nara Chandrababu Naidu, our party President and the legislators of Andhra Pradesh who have elected me to this august House.
Sir, this august body, where Members are drawn from diverse fields of arts, politics, eminent professionals, academics and industry, makes it unique in our great democracy. I come from an industrial background, which I had started at an early age. After doing my Post Graduation in Engineering in 1986, I had started a small-scale industry. This grew into a group of industries which presently employs 6000 people, known as the Sujana Group of Companies. The name 'Sujana', I am proud to say, was coined out of the first few letters of the names of my beloved parents, Shrimati Susheela and Shri Janardhana Rao. My grandfather, an IPS officer, retired from the CBI and my father retired as Superintending Engineer in the Government of Andhra Pradesh. My great grandfathers were agriculturists. So, the evolution of my career is in rural areas and, therefore, I am blessed with exposure to all major spheres of the society.
Sir, the Preamble to our Constitution says, "We the people of India give this country to ourselves..". To me the word "We" means all the people of India. I stressed on the word "all" because in the nature, the jungle law that rules is the survival of the cleverest; in the organized and civilized society, the law has to protect the meek from the strong. This was stated, over and over again, by the framers of our Constitution. The Preamble and articles 38(1), 38(2), 39B, 39C and 46 talk about reduction of inequality in income and giving equal access to resources of the country. Just as a blind man cannot thank us for giving him a mirror, the poor man cannot thank us for not implementing the equality, the mandate of the Constitution. Thus, the essence of the Constitution is equality to be achieved through a conscious attempt to help those in society, who cannot help themselves. A fine example of this is the philanthropic efforts of successful business people like Warren Buffet and Bill Gates. I commend the cause of charity in its full sense espoused by them. Perhaps, they believe that what they give,they have, and what they keep, they lose. These kind-hearted men are practising what Gandhiji said that rich people are the custodians and trustees of their wealth for the benefit of the poor. Since such kind hearts are not many, I would vote for a very visible hand of the Legislature, Executive and Judiciary to make laws and policies of affirmative action and vigorously implement them.
Sir, there is a State sanction behind every citizen's security and legitimate earning.The State, in turn, gets its authority and legitimacy from the citizens through the social contract concept developed by political philosophers like Thomas Hobbes and Locke and Rousseau. In a democratic country like India, periodic elections to State and Centre constitute the social contract and needs to be continuously strengthened.
Sir, while appreciating the efforts that are being made for rationalization of direct and indirect taxes, a time has come to restore estate duty which would be a step towards reducing the gap between the rich and the poor. Sir, for quite some time, I thought, eliminating poverty and creating wealth are the same. But, on being more matured, I realised that the creation of wealth will necessarily not eliminate poverty or reduce the gap between the rich and the poor.
Sir, the Government works for making a difference in the living standard of the people. It means that ensuring roti, kapda and makaan alone is not sufficient. Ensuring only them implies that we are not elevating the general...
Sir, while ensuring the above, we should target good health, education and creation of individual opportunity as our objective and guiding principle for governance.
Sir, having dwelt upon my political philosophy, I now move forward to discuss about the Energy Conservation (Amendment) Bill, 2010. The energy conservation as we all know is a wide topic that most of our hon. Members spoke. It broadly encompasses efficient utilization of electricity and fossil fuels. The current Bill in discussion appears to only cover the energy efficiency measures with a view to conserve power. Although it is important to address this issue, it would be desirable to adopt a holistic approach to include conservation of fuels and ecosystems.
Sir, the current installed capacity of 1,31,000 MW is required to be increased to about 9,50,000 MW by 2030 as stated by the hon. Prime Minister recently. To create this gigantic future electricity generating capacity, it is estimated that a massive Rs.60,000 billion investment is required. However, as the ho. Members are aware, this expenditure can be far from reality considering several Budgetary constraints. Therefore, I am of the opinion that part of this problem can be addressed through strict adherence to the measures proposed to be implemented through this Bill.
Sir, having gone through the proposed amendments, I suggest the following changes. Section 14(C) of the Energy Conservation Act, 2001, after the proposed amendment prohibits issuance of notification within six months in normal cases and one year in special circumstances. Even after the proposed amendment, there is no obligation on the part of the Government to issue notification prohibiting the use of energy inefficient equipment after six months or one year, as the case may be. Once a product is notified under section 14 (A), any equipment not conforming to prescribed norms should be automatically prohibited from sale, import, etc., after six months or one year, as the case may be.
A new section 14(A) is proposed to be inserted. As per this proposed section, in case there is a saving of energy by the designated consumer, an energy saving certificate would be issued. This can be sold to a designated consumer who is not complying with the energy consumption norms. There may be a case that for reasons, a designated consumer may not be in a position to encash these certificates. Therefore, a clear mechanism may be put in place to enable immediate encashment of such certificates.
In addition to the above suggestions, I propose the consideration of the following steps to make the initiatives of the Government for energy conservation more effective and meaningful. (1) target the sector where there is a scope for energy savings (2) Accelerate and incentivize indigenous R&D for developing energy efficient appliances and systems and provide fiscal incentives to industries established to absorb such energy efficient technologies; (3) Conversion of inefficient AC agricultural water pumps to either more efficient AC pump sets or DC pumps using permanent magnets; (4) All street, municipal and Government installation to switch to LED lighting mandatorily, in a phased manner, like in the United States of America, which has been following it; (5) To meet rural lighting requirements with solar and LED light combination which is cheaper and more sustainable, and the technology is fully proven, compared to current solar/CFL combinations; (6) Include use of LED luminaries in Lamp Bachat Yojana Scheme; (7) Reroute the perennial kerosene, MNRE subsidies towards promotion of sustainable energy efficient systems; (8) Weak aluminium conductors to be recycled/re-conducted or replaced to reduce the transmission and distribution losses; (9) Strictly enforce energy efficient norms and prohibit sale/import of energy inefficient devices; and (10) As is the adage, ‘power saved is power generated’, there should be a provision to incentivize virtual energy generation system.
Sir, with the above suggestions, I conclude my maiden speech and am grateful to the Chair and the hon. Members of the House for providing me this opportunity. Thank you very much, Sir.
